Yesterday, in a tight vote (24 - 21), the Maryland Senate voted to approve same sex marriage legislation.
The state senators listed below, because of their own prejudices, ignorance and/or bigotry, decided to vote on the wrong side of history and try to deny the right of two consenting adults to marry.
Anne Arundel County
John Astle - Democrat
James DeGrange - Democrat
Edward R. Reilly - Republican
Bryan Simonaire - Republican
Baltimore County
Norman R. Stone, Jr. - Democrat
Calvert County
Thomas V. Miller - Democrat
Carroll County
Joseph Getty - Republican
Charles County
Thomas Middleton - Democrat
Dorchester County
Richard F. Colburn - Republican
Frederick County
David R. Brinkley - Republican
Garrett County
George Edwards - Republican
Harford County
Barry Glassman - Republican
Nancy Jacobs - Republican
J.B. Jennings - Republican
Prince George's County:
Ulysses Currie - Democrat
C. Anthony Muse - Democrat
Douglas Peters- Democrat
Queen Anne's County
Edward J. (E.J.) Pipkin - Republican
St. Mary's County:
Roy P. Dyson - Democrat
Washington County
Christopher B. Shank - Republican
Worcester County
James Mathias - Democrat
Absent
Prince George's County
Joanne Benson - Democrat
But we can imagine how she would vote:
But Sen. Joanne Benson said her father – who was a "civil rights warrior" and a friend of Kittleman's father – taught her that marriage can only be between one man and woman.
"My father often talked to us about the importance of marriage," said Benson, D-Prince George's. "One thing he said to us was you get married because one of the most important reasons for marriage is to have children."
Sadly, this is one of the most assinine and just plain stupid rationalizations for doing the wrong thing I've read from a Maryland Democrat for a long time (and I've read some doozies over the past couple years).
What's more, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller has said that if this legislation does become law then a referendum question would be on the 2012 ballot. And this bill's chances of becoming law look pretty good.
It's one thing to go against your party and lose the vote, Mike. It's another thing to actively try and defeat legislation after it has already been passed.
Also, Mike - when you put these dumbass referendums on ballots for the public to vote on, it just makes some of us think what the hell are we paying you for?
And finally, why do churches and religious institutions get special exemptions from anti-discriminatory policies? Do religous groups have the right to refuse to participate in weddings based on race?
Senators amended the bill to include protections for religious groups and institutions to keep them from being forced to participate in gay weddings.
Source1.
Source2.