My Photo

July 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Sign Up Now

Become a Fan

« RadioShank: Of Montreal | Main | RadioShank: Danzig »

Comments

fordprefectajt

Well, to be fair, dating and marriage are forms of prostitution. By that, I mean no disrespect to dating, marriage, or prostitution.

Michael P

That is correct. Purely from both a scientific and linguistic standpoint what Mr.Rudov said was accurate even if it the wording upset some. The legal definition of prostitution is “offering or agreeing to engage in sexual acts. While payment may be any nonsexual consideration, most commonly today it is the form of money or goods. Any evolutionary biologist understands the simple principal fact that females exchange sexual access (or the hopes for sexual access!) for a wide variety of non sexual benefits. In the dating process it is the male who almost always bears the cost of the process. Maybe nature is not politically correct or so “romantic” sounding but "it is what it is". That's life. Mr. Rudov is simple reciting what Scientists since Darwin have known very well.

Sally Mander

Adorable! It's like a mini He-Man Woman Haters Club.

Boys, boys, boys...

According to Merriam-Webster:
Prostitution: the act or practice of engaging in promiscuous sexual relations especially for money

Date: a social engagement between two persons that often has a romantic character

Marriage: the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law

If you'll notice the definitions, there is no sex or financial transaction inherent in the definition of "dating" or "marriage. And there is no romance inherent in the definition of "prostitution".

Also, your definition doesn't take into consideration dates that go "dutch" or dates where the woman picks up the tab.

So what I mean to say is, if you think dating/marriage is prostitution, you've been doing it wrong.

And yes, I've read Darwin and Desmond Morris.

Rudov is a pig ass as are those who share his opinion. No disrespect.

echofoxtrot

@sally mander,
you're just another feminazi idiot. YOU'RE the pig ass, or should I say, a sow ass. Real men like me DO ask women to go dutch, but most of them are princesses like you who cop an attitude when a man suggests going dutch. You obviously lack the intellect necessary to comprehend the grim realities that face men in divorce courts -- but men do -- they are refusing to marry in record numbers.
Oh - no disrespect intended.

Sally Mander

Exactly.

Angry virgins.

tango

@sallymander,
you're wrong about that, as well. I've been with about 25-30 women; I lost count somewhere along the way. Mr. Rudov's point is that a man need not subordinate himself to a woman, or otherwise kiss her ass, to go to bed with her. You offer the dominatrix/entitled female model; weak-spirited men falsely believe that they have to kiss your ass. Mr. Rudov's point is to avoid entitled princesses like you altogether, so that there is no need for ass-kissing on either side of the fence.

Sally Mander

Wow. 25-30 women? You Casanova!

But be honest, that number would most likely be closer to 0 once you deduct the ones you roofied and the real prostitutes.

Rudov's point is he hates women. If you agree, it's because you hate women. It's very simple, fellas.

The comments to this entry are closed.